This is a topic that generates constant conflicts between owners and tenants, however, it is an economic cuantità cuestión low, usually does not end in the courts, for which there are many criteria of jurisprudence in this regard. The problem in real life is diverse and different, but that gets little impact in the courts.
The root of the problem is to know, in the face of damage or failure in the building or any of its fixed or mibile, who has the obligation to make repairs .
The first criterion is simple: "Who breaks pay. If you can determine the culprit there is no possibility of debate. If the toilet is clogged, the plumber comes in and finds an object that should not be there (eg absorbent), the lessee pays the repair. Second criterion: the importance of the element and the fault. The owner is obliged, without raising the rent for it, to make all repairs necessary to maintain the property in order to serve the living conditions stipulated use, except when the damage for which is required repair is attributable to tenant. Small repairs due to wear for everyday use of the property will be borne by the lessee . So repair of a tuber pay the owner, the repair of blinds, sinks, electrical outlets, door handles, sarrature doors and windows and things like that, the tenant pays the .
0 comments:
Post a Comment